6 Comments
May 24Liked by πŸ…ŸπŸ…πŸ…€πŸ…› πŸ…œπŸ…πŸ…’πŸ…šπŸ…ž

As a β€˜fiend of fine distinctions’, I’m sorry that this link doesn’t seem to work. Perhaps there’s a glitch 😐

Expand full comment
author

That's weird, it works for me. Here is the original article on WSJ: https://www.wsj.com/arts-culture/books/dictionary-of-fine-distinctions-review-subtle-shades-of-meaning-7ab49d02

Expand full comment
May 24Β·edited May 24Liked by πŸ…ŸπŸ…πŸ…€πŸ…› πŸ…œπŸ…πŸ…’πŸ…šπŸ…ž

Thank you.

That’s much better. I’ve now managed to access it ⭐️

Expand full comment
author

Nice.

Expand full comment
May 24Liked by πŸ…ŸπŸ…πŸ…€πŸ…› πŸ…œπŸ…πŸ…’πŸ…šπŸ…ž

The reviewer has missed the fine distinction between β€˜thus’ and β€˜therefore’. I find that really funny, as well as ironic. (I told you I was a fiend!)

Expand full comment