Not to be contrarian, but I see the need for two bridges, and I am not understanding why they want to demolish the Ambassador Bridge. (Or maybe they have by now?) Isn't that just replacing one monopoly with another, but this time owned by government(s)? And am wondering if that is better.
Not to be contrarian, but I see the need for two bridges, and I am not understanding why they want to demolish the Ambassador Bridge. (Or maybe they have by now?) Isn't that just replacing one monopoly with another, but this time owned by government(s)? And am wondering if that is better.
This article has a lot of spicy food for thought