Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Gottfried's avatar

Great article.

First, about Jack and Bobby: Actually, when they touted their speed reading, it was part and parcel of a much larger thing with them: They urged Americans to strive for excellence and achievement. It was a way of distinguishing themselves from Eisenhower. For example, in around 1957, Russia scared the pants off of America with the Sputnik achievement in outer space. Americans were afraid that Russia would surpass us with scientific leaps into the unknown. By the early sixties, we saw a succession of shows on TV in which evil Russian scientists would take over the earth.

Kennedy promised to rescue America with intellect, physical fitness and the Green Berets. He sort of like marketed himself to Americans as the James Bond of American politics.

Now for speed reading itself:

a) I find my comprehension is boosted when I read faster. Also, reading is more enjoyable when I read faster because MORE STUFF HAPPENS IN LESS TIME. Suppose you are reading at 400 words a minute. In one minute's time, you are gonna be bored to death reading about someone sitting down at the dinner table. But if you read at the rate of 1000 words per minute, you will not only read a farty story about people sitting down to dinner; you will also read about the food fight after they sat down and the severe allergic reaction someone suffered from the food.

Expand full comment
Sharon McRae's avatar

An interesting read, Paul. I'm not a real fan of speed reading, regardless of whether it works or not. To me, reading that fast would take the pleasure out of reading. It would be like greatly speeding up a piece of music... sure, that would save time but what you lose in the process doesn't seem worth it. Isn't life already overloaded with information without trying to fit more in? It's a no from me :-)

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts